Ticktock+Choo-Choo


 * The __Ticktock Choo-Choo__ will be an [isothetical?] idea that will describe Time in the entirety of its peculiar nature, and how it realtes to Stork and Warblers, or Warkology, in a very special way.** Ticktock implying the association with Time, and Choo-Choo for a superexistent Train. Although the behavior of the __Ticktock Choo-Choo__ will be in no way linear, it will diverge and converge and be infinite and looped and so on. In the future, these quirky properties of Time will be duly noted and explained, but for now, the interactions, existence and ramifications between Storks and Warblers are largely uninvestigated.

In a way, Hugh Everett's Many-Worlds Theory can support Warks/Storblers. In quantum mechanics, decades ago,, there was, and still is, a problem. Why can we see onyl one position at any given time when oberving a particle? Quantum mechanics [Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, for one] dictates that a particle is always in a superposition, since we can only ever have a probability of what state it may be in before observation, which alters the state of the particle. In other words, we view a classical form of a quantum mechanical thing. Everret used an interpretational approach to this dilemma, by creating a wave function which states that any possibility of something happening to a particle happens, which in a way eliminates probabilities, even though they were used to begin with. If so, then why don;t we experience super-reality? Everett proposed that at every observation, a particle diverges into two identical ones, save for different positions and or velocities. That explains why we only ever see one facet of an observation at a time, versus a superposition. There is an energetic interaction between the observer and the observed, which causes the divergence. This leads to the creation of countless particles and eventually universes, which introduces the idea of parallel universes and multiverses. Although this may seem like quite the radical idea, it takes advantage of the properties of quantum mechanics. It treats the whole universe as quantum mechanical, versus the the idea that the macroscopic and microscopic are governed by separate laws of physics [quantum mechanics versus classical mechanics, and so forth]. The Copenhagen Interpretation was merely a placeholder, something to drive away prying eyes, since there is no real solution to the measurement problem. Great physicists such as Niehls Bohr and Werner Heisenberg questioned this hypothesis, as it seemed to violate their understandings of the universe, which is why they attacked it. Although it seems as if the hypothesis is solid, like any other hypothesis, it does have its weak points, if not in the fundamental logic, in the math somewhere. One fo the biggest challenges to the hypothesis is that you can't really prove it, since that would require the direct or indirect observation of the consequences of an observation, which is practically impossible, if only for now. Not to mention that if we wanted better evidence, we would have to go beyond the limits of the universe, if that makes any sense, and visit other worlds similar to ours. That will probably be impossible for the next century to milennia, if not forever. Those are just a couple of the validation problems the Many-Words Theory faces, but overall, it sounds like an intriguing, and convenient, proposal. At the very least, it broadens our horizons, causes us to think and question the existence of the universe, which spurs inspiration, innovation, and better ideas to see the light of day. Now, what does this have to do with Warks? Well, if the observation of anything does create the splitting of something into two different outcomes, then you could say that if there are a limitless amount of parallel universes in which some will be different from another, not only in terms of positions and energies, but also laws of physics, then there probably is at least one outcome where our hypothesis holds true. It makes sense: with an infinite amount of possiblities, chances are that there could be at least one situation where Warks exist, although not in the way they were intitially thought of. Since we're talking of the concept of superexistence, that Storks and Warblers aren't avian beings in the true sense, but rather, an attempt to describe the existence of our universe, then it also makes sense that they could be "real" somewhere else. In this way, Storblers do exist, along with the Ticktock Choo-Choo. Granted, some universes will have similar or identical laws of physics to ours, but there will be others that will differ, which will affect the outcome of a great many things, including the existence of life. For a brief interpretation of Hugh-Everett's interpretation, click on the following link: [] For those who feel more adventurous, check out his complete dissertation with this link- [] Or, you can read the Scientific American article the Free Man and I read, which caused me to recently read up on his theory with this link: []