the+Foundation+Rule

The **__Foundation Rule__** is this: **Something may exist as long as it can not be proved it does not exist**. It is not a true establishment of said something, but rather a postulate used to back up any claim. With certain hypertheses such as the Stork Hyperthesis we will not include this postulate, since we do not care to include the possibility of a hyperthesis that would overthrow our almighty Stork Hyperthesis [for the instantaneous moment]. It may be hypocritical/ironic to note the Stork Hyperthesis was partially created by the Foundation Rule, despite our current rebuttal of it to disprove the hyperthesis, but it is extremely common for a belief system to reject anything that could disprove it, even if it is part of the system itself [in this case], since it could create some paradoxes or impossible scenarios [which, by applying the Foundation Rule and recognizing this system acknowledges all sorts of open-ended ideas, you will see there are inconsistencies existing simultaneously with consistencies], and it may offend or distract the authors of the hyperthesis from the static/dynamic destiny*. Although it may be pertinent to prove and disprove the belief system, it is also impertinent to do so, unless you are a Stork, which then would complicate this scenario even further, because if it proved and disproved itself, it could lead to an infinite series of truth and untruth, and cause the whole system to fall apart or just to grow exponentially in terms of topic-connections and facts and opinions, etc. Something that reminds us of the Liar's Paradox.


 * Here, the objective is to establish a sound Stork Hyperthesis, not to disprove it by the principles it was founded upon, at least for now, until we are ready [until we have the time to extend the Storkology of it all] to do so. It's like a Catch-22 or an exception paradox or a Socratic paradox or even a Boninian paradox [or a combination of any of the aforementioned], but not necessarily an entailment paradox [brought forth by the Inevitability Axiom]. See Other Ideas as well.