Stork+Hyperthesis

In our current language and set of languages, the word hyperthesis does not exist, so it is more open to interpretation and attached value than an established word. In this case, we will define it as the absolute/super establishment of some thought, in this case the Stork Hypothesis. Since a hypothesis is a falsifiable statement and can only be a thesis or theory if proven a sufficent amount of times, then a hyperthesis should be the logical next step of this process. A theory can be felled by opposing evidence after all, and is destroyed by a more than significant change, even if it only adds to the theory. In our book, a hyperthesis can not be disproved, so long as it is not assumed that a possible contrary theory or hyperthesis could exist if it can not be proved that it does not exist [the Foundation Rule]. Since the Stork Theory and __The Stork Hypothesis__ have been demonstrated, it is only natural the Stork Hyperthesis is true by the ambiguous Inevitable Reasoning. Since the last entry[ everything preceding this sentence], we have also determined that a hyperthesis may be directly related to other hypertheses, and by that property it may explain everything indirectly with enough connections.