Wack+Theorem


 * Wack Theorem states this: Any misguided attempt to crash this system must be thoughroughly evaluated for any possible flaws. Any idea that our system is a fool's errand is most likely an attempt to prove us Subliminalists out of wack and can thus be proven faulty. Heres' why: It is practically impossible to declare __us__ insane without first accepting the possibility the questioner may be insane, but through his perspective, everything else is insane. What appears to be sane may be insane, and vice versa. They must also disprove the Waffle Supposition and the Chimpostulate and the Law of Ambiguity without using the any theorem in the wiki for the unproof, which we can gurantee an unforeseeable prospect [at least by our terms].** If we accept nobody or everybody's out of touch, we can't disprove each other without disproving ourselves, which means we can't be proven, which means we can't disprove others, and so on. A futile inquisition, we say, for good reasons. For more support for the unsupport of any attack, see the Absolute Stork Principle.