Waffle+Supposition

What is the **Waffle Supposition**? **The Waffle Supposition states that for the sake of preventing inconvenient answers and quandaries/paradoxes, the Waffle can explain all, at least for the moment. Apparent contradictions in this wiki's logic rules are overridden by the fact that our speak contains a lot of waffle, which is communicating about certain ideas in an ambigous way. Any meaning can be derived from this so long as it is not in conflict with the set rules. The concepts themselves have waffle*, so it's a multilayered waffle within itself. This supposition itself contains waffle, and can prove itself, which in turn supports all other postulates/hypotheses, which turns them into theorems, and then hypertheses, and after that, the long-sought isotheses...** We are not dedicated to make everything seem remotely possible by insane propositions, rather, we attempt to rationalize imaginary [and real] ideas with a little playfulness thrown into the mix. We Subliminalists are the ideal hybrid of workers and procrastinators, thinkers and appliers, perspiration and inspiration. We can make this thing work, and then make it self-sustaining.


 * Waffle used in this text already has implied more than a couple meanings. We re-invented the term, and as a result of our tinkering it has become superexistent. In fact, Waffle was the Subliminalists' first word chosen to be superexistent. Waffle now also means ideas within ideas that, if pondered incorrectly, lead to a muddle of misconstrusions. Waffle also means the possibility that anything can lead to something else, perhaps indefinitely, and may or may not come back in a full circle, may or may not back itself up[ see Inevitability Axiom]. Only some derivations of said content are discussed immediately, in order to make communication and understanding of these wacky concepts possible. The rest we mention later. It would be overwhelming to find all possible values and connections and, if not already cracked, the thinker would then have to make sense of it all, and even more dauting would be to communicate with another member and have them understand it in the same or superior way. At least, an ultimate solution to this omnipresent dilemma has not yet been found, to the disappointment of all of us. The Waffle Supposition is effective, but not the true answer to this conundrum. It is meant to be a placeholder, a substitute, a temporary fix, not a permanent solution. That is, it will be for the foreseeable future, as it has expanded upon itself, so it is no longer just a postulate. It is, in fact, a theorem now.

P.S. If the reader has been left confuzzled, he/she can ask for a new page that simplifies or fully explains what the intended message is, and how to properly analyze future concepts and their proofs. We want viewers and members to be on the same page with everyone else [a technical impossibility, for a multitude of reasons, but we will not go into that here and now], otherwise, something is lost in the translation and a potential inspiration is never conceived. P.S.S. For example, every single theorem relates to one another, and leads to the conclusion that everything can disprove or prove itself. There's a lot of recurring themes and circular logic here, which can be a tad too much to handle in a quick dosage, but hopefully in time everyone will see through the "smoke and mirrors", the tangled web of thoughts of the unrealistic. P.S.S.S. In case the __Waffle Supposition__ or the Wack Theorem or the Absolute Stork Principle leaves the reader unsatisfied, check out the CIA Clause.



Waffle Related Pages
include component="pageList" hideInternal="true" tag="waffle" limit="10000" A variation of the picture on Mrs. Phelp's bulletin board in AP Biology. We like this one better, as Waffle is universal and yet so enigmatic and tangible and elusive.