Stork+Theory

How do we begin the process of explaining the existence of **The Stork** and thus all of the universe? Well, we can at least say by the Foundation Rule that there is no absolute proof that there isn't a Stork and descending Storks, since the laws of physics and other such subjects aren't absolutes, they're theories, which are supported by an awful lot of evidence and reasoning, but then again, we describe the world as it appears to us. It is probable we aren't seeing the whole story [since when?], so what we think we experience may not be true existence, or the "real" thing. Therefore, it is not stupid to say there could be some Stork, origin of all. It matters not to explain how the Stork came about, but how and why things are as they are for the moment as a result of the Stork, and not going further back to trace the lineage of Storks and the evolution of existence and spontaneous form [as stated on the Stork Hypothesis page, it is inconceivable for the moment to do so]. For all we know, no matter how much we try to learn more, we will most likely be destined to have our limits and be ignorant of a practically infinite amount of knowledge. Aside from the fact it is arrogant in and of itself to assume we can explain the workings of the Storkian Order, we have the Stork Scripture, a holy manuscript from which we draw reference to for understaning of all [as much as our brains allow us to handle]. This masterpiece of designation gives us a simple point to start with, in the form of a story and some given postulates. From there we apply specific lines of reasoning, such as the Inevitability Axiom __, the__ Insanity and Perturbations objective and __The Chimpostulate.__ There are other rules of logic we use as well, but these and the Stork Scripture are our main points of which we progress with. We could just be all holier-than-thou and claim the is the only base we need to prove ourselves, but we'll embrace the challenge as tried-and-true Subliminalists...